Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Dielsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1977No. 49516PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

On November 4, 1975, the trial judge, at the close of the evidence, pronounced his decision by stating:

« * * * it win be the order of this Court that the man (claimant) has sustained an accidental injury to his left hand, and * * * he has a disability to the left hand in the amount of fifteen per cent (15%). Gentlemen, if one of you will draw that order for me and submit it for my signature, I will sign it right away.”

Neither party submitted a proposed order. On January 20,1976, without notice or further hearing, the trial judge made and entered an order awarding claimant forty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. GumersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Austin v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Adamson v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Reed v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Dooley v. Broce Construction CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. City of Tulsa v. HemingerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Revell v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Rowland v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API