Legal Opinion
Hickman v. Gumerson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 1942No. 30026PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, C. J.
In October, 1933, plaintiff in error, Hickman, received an award of compensation at the hands of the State Industrial Commission providing for weekly payments for not exceeding 300 weeks. The award became final; no subsequent change was made therein and no part of same has been paid.
In October, 1939, a certified copy of the award was filed in the office of the court clerk of Garfield county. No such copy had previously been filed in any county within the state. In subsequent proceedings to enforce the award through the district court of said county, it was asserted that same is barred by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lahoma Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Buzzn v. Muncey Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Utah Consol. Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. EllenburgSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Rucks-Brandt Construction Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Fowler v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Pruitt v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.