Legal Opinion
Rowland v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 21, 1999No. 88,288Published
1Opinion of the Court
988 P.2d 1282 (1999)
1999 OK 75
Willie B. ROWLAND, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF TULSA and The Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.
No. 88,288.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
September 21, 1999.
Willie B. Rowland, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Pro Se Petitioner.
Susan H. Jones, Tulsa, Oklahoma, For Wilson Jones, P.C., specially appearing.
HODGES, J.
¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the Workers' Compensation Court's order on which this appeal is based, in so far as it purports to adjudicate the amount of attorney fees, is an appealable order subject to this Court's review. We find that the issue of the proper…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.