Legal Opinion

Austin v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1965No. 40668PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The action from which this appeal arises was initiated by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error and Billy F. Rodebush to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision of motor vehicles. Continued reference to the parties is as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff dismissed as to Rodebush prior to the trial below.

In his amended petition plaintiff alleged that on February 21, 1962, he was a passenger in an automobile driven by Billy F. Rodebush traveling “in a northerly direction on State Highway No. 3 about 14 miles south of Seminole,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Buehman v. SmelkerArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Larkins-Warr Trust v. Watchorn Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. KitchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. In re T.R.W.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Martin v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API