Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Heminger
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 11, 1985No. 62871PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANS, Judge.
City appeals from a decision of the three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court affirming the trial judge’s finding that Heminger sustained an accidental injury arising in the course of his employment. City contends that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we affirm.
Worker Jack Heminger was employed as a firefighter for the City of Tulsa for a little over twenty-two years. In May 1980, he retired because he was having difficulty with his hearing. As Heminger explained, “this is the reason why I retired from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- In Re Lewis'adoptionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Independent School District 1 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Esmark/Vickers Petroleum v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- American Airlines, Inc. v. McCombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Seal Rock Water District v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987