Legal Opinion

Whitman Realty & Investment Co. v. Day

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1931No. 22607. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover the. balance due on a promissory note, dated May 2, 1924, executed and delivered by the defendant Day, payable six months after date to the order of the Farmers National Bank of Colfax, which, after maturity and for a valuable consideration, it endorsed and delivered to plaintiff. The complaint is in the usual form. Defendant, in his answer, admitted the execution and delivery of the note, and set up three affirmative defenses; fraud and duress, want of consideration, and a collateral oral contemporaneous agreement. Plaintiff, in its reply, denied all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Angel v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ingebrigt v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Retail Clerks Health & Welfare Trust Funds v. Shopland Supermarket, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union v. Gateway Cafe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Pleuss v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API