Legal Opinion

Hastain v. Greenbaum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 13, 1970No. 45,688PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promis sory note. Defendants admitted execution of the note but sought to avoid it by alleging the execution was under duress.

The trial court found the facts were insufficient to sustain the allegation of duress and entered summary judgment for plaintiff for $8,000, the balance due on the note. Defendants appeal from that order.

Defendant R. R. Greenbaum is an individual doing business under the name of Time Petroleum Company; defendant California-Time Petroleum, Inc., is a corporation of which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Jamaica Time Petroleum, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Meyer v. BenelliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Rochester Machine Tool Works v. WeissWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Western Paving Co. v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Goff v. American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  4. Timi v. Prescott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr. v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API