Legal Opinion

Earle v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 24, 1999No. 98-254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiff Mark Earle appeals a ruling of the superior court granting summary judgment to the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) on the grounds that his negligence claims against SRS are barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff sued SRS claiming that SRS’s negligence allowed him to be sexually-abused by an older boy in SRS custody. Because the trial court erred in answering the threshold question of how to apply the retroactivity provision of the statute of limitations for cases of childhood sexual abuse, we reverse and remand.

“[S]ummary judgment is appropriate only…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Murray v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Turner v. Roman Catholic DioceseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Johnathan J. Billewicz v. Town of Fair HavenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. A.B. v. S.U.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Earle v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Pike v. Chuck's Willoughby Pub, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API