Turner v. Roman Catholic Diocese
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont appeals an adverse final judgment on the grounds that the superior court erred by (1) granting plaintiff James Turner’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and setting aside the jury’s finding on the statute of limitations’ discovery period, (2) failing to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of negligent supervision, and (3) granting a mistrial and awarding sanctions against defendant. Plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground that the court erred by empanelling a juror who is a member of the diocese. We reverse and remand.
¶2. The basic facts…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re Estate of Alden v. Alden v. AldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Zimmerman v. Poly Prep Country Day SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Pease v. Windsor Development Review BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Parsons Hill PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. MemoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.