Legal Opinion

Turner v. Roman Catholic Diocese

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 9, 2009No. 2008-003PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont appeals an adverse final judgment on the grounds that the superior court erred by (1) granting plaintiff James Turner’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and setting aside the jury’s finding on the statute of limitations’ discovery period, (2) failing to dismiss plaintiff’s claim of negligent supervision, and (3) granting a mistrial and awarding sanctions against defendant. Plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground that the court erred by empanelling a juror who is a member of the diocese. We reverse and remand.

¶2. The basic facts…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In re Estate of Alden v. Alden v. AldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Zimmerman v. Poly Prep Country Day SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Pease v. Windsor Development Review BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Parsons Hill PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. State v. MemoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API