Legal Opinion

Earle v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 1, 2006No. 05-029PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff Nathan Earle appeals from a summary judgment order entered in favor of defendant Vermont Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services [SRS].1 Plaintiff claims that SRS was negligent in both placing and failing to remove or control a foster child in plaintiff’s grandparents’ house, and, as a result, the foster child sexually abused him. Plaintiff further claims that SRS was negligent in failing to remove him from his own household despite evidence of physical abuse by his mother. SRS challenges plaintiff’s claims on numerous theories, including lack of duty and sovereign…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. LaShay v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Georgia Department of Human Services v. SpruillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Wright v. PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  3. Tina Stocker v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. James Ingerson v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections and Leanne SallsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. Brousseau v. BrousseauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API