Legal Opinion
Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 28, 1937No. 27489PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The Colored Hospital Association of Tulsa brought suit against the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county to recover $890.45 for hospitalization of paupers for the month of June, 1931. The contention that the services were performed under an agreement with the county commissioners, first set up in the pleadings, was afterwards abandoned and the hospitál relied upon the so-called statutory liability of the county to care for the indigent sick in emergency cases, as discussed in Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & Hospital, 116 Okla. 249, 244 P. 426.
The trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anadarko Funeral Home v. ScarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Board of Com'rs v. Morningside Hospital & Training School for NursesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Holcombe v. Major CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petite v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- City of Tulsa v. SislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Board of Co. Com'rs of Okmulgee Co. v. MingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Opinion No. 76-299 (1976) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1976