Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. City of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1937No. 25646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The plaintiff in error, Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, plaintiff below, furnished gas to the defendant in error, city of Enid, defendant below, during the fiscal year 1929-1930 of the value of $4,275.82, of which amount the defendant has paid the sum of $2,317.32, leaving a balance unpaid of $1,958.50, for which suit was brought. There was no specific contract between plaintiff and defendant relative to the furnishing of such gas during the fiscal year in question. However, it was stipulated between the parties at the trial of this cause that the plaintiff furnished and the defendant accepted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. City of McAlester v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Board of Com'rs v. Southwest Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Board of Co. Com'rs of Okmulgee Co. v. MingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API