Legal Opinion
Anadarko Funeral Home v. Scarth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 30, 1935No. 23691PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, were undertakers in Anadarko, Okla. On August 4, 1930, they entered into a written contract with the board of county commissioners of Caddo county wherein they agreed to embalm, clothe, furnish graves, conduct funerals, and completely furnish and supervise the burials of such dead bodies as would become a charge upon the county during the fiscal year. For such service plaintiffs were to receive a certain reasonable sum, stated in the contract, for each person buried.
On the date upon which the contract was made the amount already within the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- In Re Town of AftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Enid v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wyatt-Doyle & Butler Engineers, Inc. v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Layne-Western Co. v. City of DepewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Association Collectors, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.