Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Sisler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 31, 1955No. 36584PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
Plaintiff sought recovery against the County of Tulsa and the City of Tulsa jointly in one cause of action and against the County of Tulsa only in a second .cause of action, for medical treatment and hospital care furnished by him to indigent patients.
Plaintiff is a practicing physician and owner and manager of a hospital in the City of Tulsa. In his first cause of action he alleged that approximately forty patients, whose names he listed, were brought to his hospital for treatment over a period from July 1, 1952 to June 8, 1953; that all of these patients were brought to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Edward Thompson Co. v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. Hillcrest Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Lutheran Medical Center v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991