Legal Opinion

Potter v. Potter

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 11, 2001No. MJG-00-63PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.

Kevin Potter, acting pro se, filed this action against his parents, seeking damages for personal injury. (Paper No. 1.) Mr. Potter alleges that his parents were negligent in not having a tree, which they knew had been struck by lightning, removed from their property. He claims that while he was on his parents’ property helping them garden, his father negligently tried to remove the sixty-foot tree by himself, which caused the tree to fall, strike and injure Mr. Potter. The Defendant-parents, acting pro se, filed an answer admitting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  3. Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
  5. Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Pinney v. Nokia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Akeva L.L.C. v. Adidas America, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  3. Randolph v. PowerComm Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Wiseman v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
  5. Broadvox-CLEC, LLC v. AT & T Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API