Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal we confront two issues. We decide first whether the involvement of California water law issues in an antitrust case warrants either dismissal for reasons of wise judicial administration or abstention. Because dismissal was not necessary for reasons of wise judicial administration and since federal resolution of the antitrust claims does not unduly intrude upon state interests, we affirm the district court’s refusal to dismiss or abstain. We also decide whether a city enjoys immunity from the antitrust laws for refusing consent to a water district which…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by233 opinions
- Larry Whitford v. Captain BoglinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Luisa M. Fernandez v. Bankers National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Preserve Endangered Areas of Cobb's History, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.