Legal Opinion
Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of Bakersfield
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 31, 1986No. CV-F-84-324 RECPublishedCited by 235 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDERS
COYLE, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”), filed September 20, 1984, alleges Sherman Act violations, breach of contract, and unfair competition arising out of a contract to purchase water from defendant. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15, which creates federal jurisdiction for claims arising under the Sherman Act, and under pendent jurisdiction.
Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that it is immune from liability under the federal antitrust laws under the doctrine of state action immunity. In the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- Larry Whitford v. Captain BoglinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Luisa M. Fernandez v. Bankers National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.