Legal Opinion
Berkey Technical Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided November 21, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-27; Court 71-6-00284PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Judge:
This motion arises out of litigation in which certain articles, imported by the plaintiff, were classified by the customs officials under item 653.39 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified, as “other illuminating articles, or parts thereof, of base metal”, and were assessed with duty at 19 per centum ad valorem. Pursuant to rule 4.7(d) of the rules of this court, plaintiff has moved for an order to compel the defendant to make more definite and certain a paragraph in its answer.
Rule 4.7(d) provides:
“(d) Motion for More Definite Statement: Any party may move for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Nicketta v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
- Etablissements Neyrpic v. Elmer C. Gardner, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
- Fleming v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941
- W. A. Gleeson v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Beker Industries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Lansing Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.