Legal Opinion
Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 13, 1984No. Court 81-1-00100PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order on Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss in Part.
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rules 8(c) and 12(f) of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade 1 for an order striking certain denials from the defendant’s answer. Defendant opposes the motion and cross-moves to dismiss in part for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to rule 12(b)(5).
The underlying dispute pertains to the proper classification of certain imported merchandise known as “fused quartz” or “fused silica.” The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Krauss v. Keibler-Thompson Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Siemens America, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Jimlar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.