Legal Opinion

Nicketta v. National Tea Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,689PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

In an amended complaint filed in the circuit court of Cook county by Rose Nicketta, a minor, Charles Nicketta, Frances Nicketta and Marie Nicketta against National Tea Company, they alleged that Frances Nicketta purchased from defendant, a retail meat dealer, fresh pork for domestic use and consumption by her and her family; that there existed an implied warranty that the pork, after proper cooking, would be fit, wholesome and proper for human consumption; that the pork was properly cooked and then consumed by plaintiffs; and that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Tonkovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Matter of Madura v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Fligelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ivory v. United States (In Re Ivory)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
  2. Clouser v. Shamokin Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Adams v. ScheibSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Golaris v. Jewel Tea Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  5. Scheller v. Wilson Certified Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API