Legal Opinion
Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 29, 1984No. Court 84-3-00387PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
RE, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, Cerámica Regiomontana and Industrias Intercontinental, challenge the final affirmative determination of a section 751 administrative review by the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) of its original countervailing duty order. The administrative review was conducted pursuant to section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675 (1982), and pertained to ceramic tile imported from Mexico. 49 Fed.Reg. 9,919 (1984).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2631(j)(l)(B) (1982) and Rule 24(a)(1) of the Rules of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,517 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Bomont Industries v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Ugine-Savoie Imphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.