Legal Opinion
Phinn v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 11, 2007No. 07-CV-10940-DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is a “Motion to Dismiss Complaint,” filed on March 29, 2007 by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. (“COAF”). The matter has been fully briefed 1 and the court concludes a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e) (2). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant the motion.
I. INTRODUCTION
The facts relevant to Defendant’s motion are not in dispute. Plaintiff initiated his complaint on March 5, 2007, seeking class action status on behalf of himself and others…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Villagran v. Central Ford, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Hoffer v. Landmark Chevrolet Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Villagran v. Freeway Ford, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007