Legal Opinion
Samantha Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville and Bush-Quayle '92 Committee, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1997No. 95-3067PublishedCited by 806 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J., joined by Nelson, J.,
SPIEGEL, D.J. (pp. 200-203), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Samantha Sistrunk appeals the judgment for defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. and Ohio law, challenging the defendants’ exclusion of all speech opposing then-President George Bush’s reelection at a political rally held on public property. Plaintiff argues that the City of Strongsville, *196Ohio, violated her free speech rights by permitting the Bush-Quayle ’92 Committee to exclude members of the public from a traditional public forum based on the content of their speech. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by806 opinions
- Eric Martin v. William OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Forrest Zayne Brown, Stephen Michael Richmond, Christopher Michael Croft, and Tony Lynn Meadows v. Alan BargeryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Randy BIBBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John RibarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Startzell v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
801 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.