Legal Opinion

Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1987No. TC CC83-692; CA A36942; SC S33677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

This case presents the questions whether a health district board of directors is authorized, as a matter of law, to reimburse a board member for expenses incurred in the performance of district business and, if the board was so authorized, whether the jury should decide if the board, as a matter of fact, obligated itself to do so. We hold that the board has authority to reimburse, and we remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings in light of this opinion.

I

The Clatsop Care and Rehabilitation District was formed in March 1978,1 and plaintiff was elected to the Board of Directors…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Springfield Milling Co. v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Beers v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Curzi v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. WEGROUP PC v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Oracle America, Inc. v. Oregon Health Insurance Exchange Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API