Legal Opinion

Springfield Milling Co. v. Lane County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Lane County. Tlie'facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Shattuck, J.:

This is an action at law tried in the court below upon issues of fact before the court, without a jury. The findings of the court below áre as follows:

“1. That, at the January term, 1874, of the County Court of Lane County, State of Oregon, said court, in the transaction of county business, made the following order, to wit:
“‘In the Matter of Bridge across Willamette Biver at or near Springfield.—At this day, after consideration- by the court, it is ordered that A. S. Powers be, and he is hereby appointed superintendent of the construction of a bridge across the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Dilger v. School District 24CJOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Eastman v. Clackamas Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887
  5. City of Saginaw v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API