Curzi v. Oregon State Lottery

Plaintiff Justin Curzi appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims with prejudice and a supplemental judgment awarding certain defendants their prevailing party fees. Plaintiff played state-sanctioned video poker machines offered by defendant Oregon State Lottery (the Lottery). Plaintiff brought claims against both the Lottery and several defendants who manufacture video poker machines for the Lottery (collectively, the manufacturers).1 On appeal, plaintiff raises two assignments of error. Plaintiff first assigns error to the trial court’s dismissal of his claims with prejudice. Plaintiff…