Legal Opinion

Baraga County v. State Tax Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2001No. Docket 220473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents for our review the issue whether defendant was bound by a consent judgment entered into by plaintiffs in 1994. Defendant appeals as of right from an order mandating that it not interfere with the provisions of a 1994 Tax Tribunal consent judgment that was entered into by plaintiffs and the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (hereinafter kbic). This case arises out of defendant’s decision to order plaintiff Baraga Township to include, on its regular tax rolls, 123 parcels of land that were owned by members of the kbic and were previously exempt from taxation. We affirm.

Defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Socialist Workers Party v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sloan v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Baraga County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ditmore v. MichalikMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Peterson Novelties, Inc. And Harold Barman v. City of Berkley and Raymond AngerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Lickfeldt v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API