Baraga County v. State Tax Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
This is an action seeking an order of mandamus. The State Tax Commission seeks a determination whether a consent judgment entered by the Michigan Tax Tribunal is enforceable against defendant, which was not a party to the action before the tribunal.
We hold that the consent judgment is not enforceable against defendant because defendant was not a party to the tribunal proceedings. Under the rules of how privity applies among governmental units that we adopt today, we further hold that privity does not exist in this case to bind the state by a judgment entered into by a subordinate political…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sloan v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Abbott v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.