Legal Opinion

Lickfeldt v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001No. Docket 224139PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. J. Danhof, J.

Defendants appeal as of right a grant of summary disposition and writ of mandamus ordering them to immediately terminate plaintiff’s sentences from her 1986 convictions. We affirm.

Plaintiff is a prisoner currently serving a string of consecutive sentences. Her initial conviction was in 1986 when she was sentenced to 3lk to 14 years each for two counts of uttering and publishing, MCL 750.249. In 1987, she was sentenced for prison escape, a mandatory consecutive sentence, MCL 750.193. She has since added other sentences for subsequent crimes, some adding to her consecutive string under MCL…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Clonlara, Inc v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Guardian Industries Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Baraga County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Jones v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hanlin v. Saugatuck TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. City of Bay City v. Bay County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Tuggle v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API