Legal Opinion
TMK IPSCO v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 24, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-62; Consol. Court No. 10-00055PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Kelly, Judge:
This consolidated action comes before the court on USCIT Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) determination in the countervailing duty investigation of certain oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) from the People’s Republic of China. See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China, 74 Fed. Reg. 64,045 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 7, 2009) (final affirmative countervailing duty determination, final negative criti*1333cal circumstances determination) (“Final…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- TMK IPSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Linyi Chengen Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Mosaic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.