Legal Opinion

TMK IPSCO v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 3, 2017No. Consol. 10-00055PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kelly, Judge:

Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand filed pursuant to the court’s decision in TMK IPSCO v. United States, 40 CIT -, -, 179 F.Supp.3d 1328 (2016). See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Dec. 21, 2016, ECF No. 171 (“Remand Results”). The court remanded Commerce’s final determination in its countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigation of certain oil country tubular goods (“OCTG”) from the People’s Republic of China (“China”) to explain or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  3. Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  4. TMK IPSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  3. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  4. Bio-Lab, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. Mosaic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API