Legal Opinion
Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 8, 1988No. 1210PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Judge:
*447The appealed order was the result of an appeal taken under § 1-23-150, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended, and held that the regulations of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board (the Board) do not comply with § 11-35-1590, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended, and that a lease hereinafter described awarded by South Carolina Educational Television Commission (SCETV) to Tall Tower, Inc., (Tall Tower) is null and void as not having been awarded and approved in conformance with statutory law. We reverse and remand. The result of this case hinges…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Tall Tower, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review PanelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Lominick v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- South Carolina National Bank v. Florence Sporting Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Purvis Ex Rel. Estate of Purvis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Shealy v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988