Legal Opinion
Tall Tower, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review Panel
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 30, 1987No. 22810PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This action was commenced when respondent Charleston Television protested, pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 11-35-4210 (1986), South Carolina Educational Television Commission’s (ETV’s) award of a television tower lease to Tall Tower, Inc. (Tall Tower). The lease would allow ETV, a state agency, to attach its antenna to Tall Tower’s 2000-foot broadcast tower. The Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) of the Division of General Services conducted a hearing, denied the protest, and upheld the ETV tower lease award. Charleston Television timely requested a review of the CPO’s decision by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Palmetto Alliance, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. McInnisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- South Carolina National Bank v. Central Carolina Livestock Market, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Ross v. Medical Univ. of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Kurschner v. City of Camden Planning CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Fairfield Ocean Ridge, Inc. v. Town of Edisto BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.