Legal Opinion

South Carolina National Bank v. Florence Sporting Goods, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1962No. 17961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The appellant corporation, controlled and operated by one W. Jerome McCown, was engaged in the business of selling, among other things, boats, motors and trailers, and the appellant had an arrangement with the respondent bank whereby the respondent financed certain of appellant’s operations on what is commonly known as floor plan financing.

This action in claim and delivery was commenced by the service by the Sheriff of Florence County of a summons and affidavit in claim and delivery, dated August 11, 1960, in which the respondent alleged the right to possession of certain boat…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitmire v. Cass, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Howell v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Whisenhunt v. SandelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Sandel v. WhisenhuntSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SachsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Pitts v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Charleston Television, Inc. v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Morris v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API