Legal Opinion

Probate Court v. American Fidelity Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 4, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheRburNe, J.

This is an action brought pursuant to P. L. 3059 against the defendant as surety upon the bond of Carl Morgan, administrator of the estate of Harrison Gregg. The prosecu-trix as an heir at law seeks to recover as damages the sum decreed to her by the probate court. Judgment was entered for the penalty of the bond, pursuant to the statute, and thereafter the cause was heard on the breaches of the bond assigned by the prosecutrix. Findings of fact were made and judgment was entered for the prosecutrix, to which the defendant has excepted.

So far as material to the exceptions briefed the findings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Island Pond National Bank v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. Kreichman v. Webster, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Baldwin v. TaplinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re: Will of PrudenzanoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  2. In Re Estate of CartmellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Chittenden Trust Co. v. MacPhersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. In re Estate of WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  5. Osier v. The City of BurlingtonVermont Superior Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API