Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Taplin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 5, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

It appears from the findings of fact that M. M. Taplin died intestate on June 29, 1931, leaving a widow, Susie R. Taplin, and a son, Charles R. Taplin, an only child. Soon after-wards Charles R. Taplin was appointed administrator of the estate. He served in that capacity until he resigned the trust early in 1937. On January 27, 1937, the plaintiff was appointed and qualified as administrator de bonis non, and is now serving in that capacity. The chancellor finds that at the date of his death the intestate was solvent in fact, and that on August 30, 1940, the estate was insolvent in fact and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tierney v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  3. In Re: Will of PrudenzanoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  4. McKnight v. Rice, Hoppner, Brown & BrunnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kusserow v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield PlanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API