Legal Opinion
First Nat'l B'k v. Comr. of Taxes
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 1, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles H. Bayley, late a resident of Newbury, in this State, deceased testate on January 28, 1928, leaving a large estate. His will was admitted to probate by the probate court for the district of Bradford, and letters testamentary thereon were issued to the petitioner, therein named as executor. By decree of the probate court on April 29, 1929, the petitioner, as the trustee named in the will, having duly qualified, received the residue and remainder of said estate in cash and securities, which it has since held and administered "wholly in the State of Massachusetts." By the terms of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- New York Ex Rel. Cohn v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. Clement National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- In re Fulham's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marshall v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Reed, Admr. v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
- Donoghue v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Holbrook Grocery Co. v. Commissioner of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.