Legal Opinion

In Re: Will of Prudenzano

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 1949PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackmer, J.

Albert Prudenzano and Gemma Prudenzano were husband and wife. Prior to 1940 they resided in South Hero. They had no children. On July 10, 1940, they entered into a written separation agreement. The agreement recited that they were separated and living apart, and had agreed on a settlement of all property rights and differences existing between them. Gemma agreed to assume the payment of certain bills of the parties then outstanding in the sum of $2128.01. Albert agreed to convey to Gemma through a trustee all his right, title and interest to real estate in South Hero owned by them as tenants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Randall v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Roddy v. Estate of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  3. Baldwin v. TaplinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  4. Probate Court v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1944

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  2. In Re Estate of GaskellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  3. Murray v. Cartmell'sSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  4. Dartmouth Savings Bank v. Estate of Schoen Ex Rel. AinsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. In Re Estate of CookeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API