Legal Opinion

Chittenden Trust Co. v. MacPherson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 3, 1981No. 58-80PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaxrow, J.

Chittenden Trust Company, as executor of two closed estates in the Chittenden Probate Court, brought a. civil action in Chittenden Superior Court under 32 V.S.A. § 509, seeking recovery of probate distribution fees paid to the state under 32 V.S.A. '§ 1434(6). Those fees were paid before our decision in In re Estate of Eddy, 135 Vt. 468, 380 A.2d 530 (1977), adjudging the fee in reality a tax, and unconstitutional. Chittenden also sought class action status, for its litigation under V.R.C.P. 23, as representative of other probate estates similarly situated. The trial court first accorded such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Hardenbergh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. In Re Estate of MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  4. Ward v. Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  5. In Re Estate of EddySupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LaFaso v. PatrissiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Merrilees v. TREASURER, State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Mills v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Citibank, N.A. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Polli Constr v. BraultVermont Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API