Legal Opinion
In Re Sneed
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 29, 1996No. 92-BG-1390PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent, a member of our bar, be disbarred under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) on the ground that he was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. Respondent, noting that he was convicted of only a misdemeanor, argues that his crime was not one of moral turpitude, and that the standard for disbarment under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) is unconstitutionally vague. We find no merit in these arguments, and therefore we adopt the recommendation of the Board.
I
Respondent, Thuryo Sneed, was admitted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re TidwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.