Legal Opinion
In Re Sims
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 2004No. 98-BG-1384PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
This case is before us a second time. When we last considered it, we said that Nathaniel Sims (“Sims”) had pled guilty to conflict of interest under 18 U.S.C. §§ 208 and 216(a)(1), a misdemeanor offense, which had been determined to be a non-serious misdemeanor. In re Nathaniel Sims, 844 A.2d 353, 357 (D.C.2004)(‘Nims I ”). After receiving notice of Sims’s conviction, Bar Counsel filed a specification of charges alleging that his conduct violated Rules 8.4(b), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct, and also that his conviction for a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wei Cong Mei v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re FarrenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- IN RE J. MICHAEL FARRENDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.