Legal Opinion
In Re Tucker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2000No. 94-BG-1280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) recommended that respondent, Ronald E. Tucker, be disbarred for a conviction of a crime of moral turpitude. Tucker filed an exception to the Board’s Report and Recommendation challenging whether the Board’s determination that his conduct involved moral turpitude is supported by substantial evidence in the record. We adopt the recommendation of the Board that Tucker be disbarred.
I
On September 16, 1994, Tucker entered a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to one count of attempted bribery, a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re ColesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.