Legal Opinion
Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 3, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-00185-SIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Plaintiff Unigestion Holding, S.A., doing business as “Digicel Haiti” (“Digicel”), asserts claims against Defendants, alleging common law fraud, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(b)-(d), conversion, and unjust enrichment.1 Defendants move to dismiss Digicel’s claims in its Amended Complaint.2 Defendants argue that the amended allegations of fraud continue to lack clarity and specificity as to the nature and substance of any alleged misrepresentation. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Shoultz v. DerrickDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Ahern v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Chrysler Pacifica Fire Recall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Deanna Brown-Thomas v. Tommie Rae HynieDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.