Timber Trails Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a planning and zoning commission’s failure to comply with General Statutes (Rev. to 1977) § 8-3 (a), as amended by Public Acts 1977, No. 77-509, § 2,1 which required, inter alia, that a copy of proposed regulations be filed in the town clerk’s office for public inspection prior to the public hearing on the proposed regulations, deprived the commission of its jurisdiction to adopt such proposed regulations, thereby rendering its vote to adopt them void. We answer this question in the affirmative and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kane v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Fletcher v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hutchison v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Capurso v. FlisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Passero v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Cole v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Timber Trails Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Samperi v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.