Legal Opinion
Passero v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 9, 1967PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
The plaintiffs are the owners of certain tracts of land in Norwalk which lie partly in a light industrial zone and partly in a B residence zone. Prior to September 14, 1966, § 15 of the Nor-walk zoning regulations contained, in paragraph 3, a provision of general application throughout Nor-walk pertaining to the use of certain lots which are divided by a zone boundary line. On July 16, 1966, and again on July 25, 1966, the defendant, the zoning commission of Norwalk, hereinafter referred to as the commission, caused to be published in The Norwalk Hour a legal notice of a public hearing to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neuger v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Edward Balf Co. v. Town of East GranbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Scovil v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jarvis Acres, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Glaspey & Sons, Inc. v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Hawkes v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- R. B. Kent & Son, Inc. v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.