Legal Opinion

Kane v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 9, 1930PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari brought under § 27A inserted in G. L. c. 40 by St. 1924, c. 133. Its object is to examine for alleged errors of law the proceedings of the board of appeals of Medford relative to variance in the application of the zoning ordinance of that city. The case was heard on the petition and return. The petitioners requested rulings to the effect that “on the record and evidence in the case” the records in question should be quashed. Reference to the evidence in these requests was impertinent. This is not one of the rare cases where evidence rightly could be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Farmington River Water Power Co. v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Selectmen of Wakefield v. Judge of First District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Leahy v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Standerwick v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API