Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Bartlett & Byers
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 29, 1924No. 7 Div. 464PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The appellees Bartlett & Byers sued T. W. Ross and W. D. Ross in detinue for three bales of cotton, and a quantity of corn and fodder. Plaintiffs’ claim is based on a mortgage executed to them by defendants on March 17, 1921, securing a debt of $1,000, which conveyed to plaintiffs the legal title to this property, and which was in default on November 21, 1921.
The property was seized under a' writ of detinue, and thereupon the appellant, W. T. Gillespie, intervened as claimant, filing his affidavit and bond as required by law, setting up that this property was raised on his land during the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keyser v. Maas & SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Russell v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Askew Bros. v. Steiner & LobmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Ellerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of Moundville v. WalshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Gay & Bruce v. W. B. Smith & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- W. B. Smith & Sons v. GayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Bellingrath v. SamuelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Warren v. PeppersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.