Legal Opinion
Warren v. Peppers
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1944No. 4 Div. 791PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
Appellee, Peppers, brought this suit against appellant, Warren, seeking damages for the alleged conversion of a Ford motor truck, and for the sum of $112, alleged in count 2, of the amended complaint, to be due for work and labor done by plaintiff for defendant; and in count 3 of said amended complaint, alleged to be due by account.
The case was tried before the court without a jury on the amended complaint, and on defendant’s pleas of the general issue, and of res adjudicata.
The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff for the sum of $668 damages for the conversion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forbes v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- American Standard Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Gillespie v. Bartlett & ByersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Assets Realization Co. v. GanusAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Wingfield Motor Co. v. DupontAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Ray D. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980