Legal Opinion

Gay & Bruce v. W. B. Smith & Sons

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1924No. 7 Div. 460PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouhdin, J.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of a bale of cotton, brought by a mortgagee against a purchaser from the mortgagor. A count in detinue was added, but not litigated. One issue in the court below was the question of constructive notice to the purchaser by the record of the mortgage. The mortgage was recorded in Randolph county. The cotton was grown in that county, hauled over into Clay county, and there sold the same day. There was conflict in the evidence as to whether the mortgagor resided in Clay or Randolph at the time the mortgage was given and recorded.

To operate as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keith & Son v. HamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Foxworth v. Brown Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Gillespie v. Bartlett & ByersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Belser v. Youngblood & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Mutual Warehouse Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. B. Smith & Sons v. GayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Wells v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Johnson v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Darden v. OgleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Johnson v. PruittAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API