Legal Opinion

Bellingrath v. Samuel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1929No. 3 Div. 864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBOTJLDLSr, J.

A mortgage given by a tenant upon an implanted or ungathered crop is subject to the superior lien of the landlord for rent.

This rule obtains although the mortgagee has no actual notice, nor knowledge of facts to put him on inquiry, which, if followed up, would disclose the existence of the tenancy. It has been extended to cases wherein the mortgagee represented himself as the owner of the land, or was in fact a purchaser in possession, but subject to a condition that upon default in payment of purchase money, the relation of landlord and tenant should exist. This by force of positive statute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lomax v. LeGrand & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Hughes & Tidwell Supply Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Scaife & Co. v. StovallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Ehrman v. OatsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. British & American Mortgage Co. v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Johnson v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Johnson v. PruittAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API